Saturday, January 30, 2016

Trump as Hitler - the Donald and der Fuehrer

Trump as Hitler... An illogical rant coming from a leftist resentful of the political ascent of the moneyed big-mouth real estate mogul from Manhattan? Or perhaps a warning rooted in an understanding of human nature, and the malleability of our collective conscience.

First, I want to establish my concern for the state of the American body politic. The heinous attack on New York - September 11, 2001 - may prove to be the seminal event that will characterize the 21st century as an epoch fraught with fear, distrust and irrationality. Although American foreign policy and CIA intrigue have promoted acts of violence and foreign incursion for over 60 years - Guatemala and Iran 1953, Cuba 1959-1962 etc. - the war of aggression against Iraq that followed 9-11 was unprecedented in scale, poor judgement, and popularity! The initially small outcry of concern over president G. W. Bush's inept leadership was characterized as unpatriotic and there was even some consideration of sedition laws - a mark of despotism and dictatorship. Perhaps trying to "get even" for the eventual crescendo of criticism that later dogged the Bush presidency, Republicans mounted a campaign of ridicule and disrespect against the succeeding Democratic president, derisively referred to as Mister Obama - they couldn't even address him as President. The result of these two diametrically opposed presidencies is an ever widening gap between "conservatives" and "liberals."

I place these words in quotes because their meaning has changed from their classic definition. "Conservative" has become a rallying cry for anti-establishment sentiments that in reality fit the dictionary definition of radical! And a concentrated effort from self-termed neo-conservatives has turned the word liberal into a pejorative: "What's the definition of a liberal? Someone who'll give you the shirt off someone else's back..." The well-orchestrated conservative movement has co-opted the alienation and disgust of an increasingly impoverished blue-collar worker class and married it to the haughtiness and imperialism of the cynical rich by appealing to feelings of disenfranchisement, re-defining the words and achievements of liberals, and (dirty word!) socialists. The nation has no dialogue now, only flag-waving, sloganeering and appeals to bigotry through coded dog-whistle discourse.

The present schism between sarcastic regressionism and frustrated altruism can only be healed by a review of the principles of the Enlightenment that were refined and incorporated into the Constitution and Bill of Rights by the more erudite founders of the United States. How ironic that the freed U.S. colonies in turn became a colonial empire, and in spite of our rhetoric of equality we had to fight a great Civil War to break the shackles of slavery, a scourge which reverberates in inequalities still suffered today. We have an inability to review our history and learn from it, and control of school curricula is an untouchable sacred cow almost immune to thoughtful revision. It seems more important to propagandize our youth than to teach the art of critical thinking! And mass culture is more intent on turning a dollar than any attempt at providing unbiased information and rational discussion.

So we are now ripe for the ascent of the demagogue. A beleaguered citizenry has no time for thought, parroting the attitudes of elders and talk-show manipulators. Even though unemployment has been cut in half, taxes have decreased, millions of people previously denied health care now have it, rapacious bankers are kept in check, clean energy and automotive industries are prospering - nevertheless - with stagnant wages and the constant tirade against "big government" there is a poisoning of our national pride, and the modern artifact of 9-11 is constant fear. The negative phenomena carry too much weight - bad news sells - and those who crave power will fan the fires of negativism for their own benefit. Termed "agnotology," spreading confusion and deceit to strengthen one's position is a classic ploy of the power seeker, a la Hitler.

Speaking of the devil, Hitler was one of the first demagogues to sense the power of technology and use it to further his desire for dominance. The public address system was invented in 1908, and in 1919 Woodrow Wilson was the first president to use it in this country. But the decorated stadium with an array of distributed loudspeakers adding a touch of magic to the occasion - shocking and impressing a naive populace - that was a hallmark of the Third Reich. It doesn't require a lot of insight to see that Donald Trump is a master at the use of broadcast media in today's America. He tells us he has a cadre of followers who would stick with him even if he fired a pistol in the streets of New York. His followers find this humorous, while rational thinkers find his rhetoric frightening.

Now, to be clear, the process here is a comparison of methodologies. We have an incomplete picture of who Mister Trump is at heart. His desire to make America great - an appeal to nationalism - or an honest evocation? But his concept of building a wall - this belongs to a post-war Stalin cordoning off East Berlin. And his attitude toward Muslims has dangerous parallels in our incarceration of Japanese citizens after Pearl Harbor, and Hitler's persecution of the Jews. He may not be a monster, but Trump is no statesman. His use of television to shoot from the hip and sound off on thoughtless premises presages a hostile stance from government that would create more enemies than friends should his popularity translate into a rise to the presidency.

The most frightening aspect of Trump's lust for the presidency is his ability to satisfy a need for authoritarianism. A few years ago there was a psychological study on basic values held by Democrats versus those of Republicans. A conclusion of the study found that most Democrats come from families that shared chores, shared decision-making, respected majority rule and freedom of the individual. And Republicans were more often products of top-down, hierarchical and patriarchal families. People tend to replicate their family dynamics through their politics. Donald Trump has great authoritarian appeal. His rudeness and brashness may be symptomatic of a snobby, spoiled rich, brat - but for the struggling working class folk feeling disenfranchised - here's a guy who acts out in ways that they aren't allowed, and his outbursts have great appeal. He answers their need for an authority figure and he seems to be in consonance with their frustrations.

Hopefully our man Trump is not evil incarnate, as we view Hitler today - but he's using the same devices - and the national substrate in present day America may be just as volatile as pre-war Germany. Trump's recent boycott of the Republican presidential debate shows his disdain for party standards. And while there was some talk early on about starting a third party campaign, a coup (rather than a putsch) taking over the Republican party is a more likely possibility.

If Trump's ascendancy continues, if he maneuvers the giant dominoes of agnotology, media control and authoritarianism and brings them crashing down on a society alienated from the status quo - inspiring voters to try his brand of emotionalism and knee-jerk, unstudied policy - we may end up with a loose cannon on the world stage. An unprepared president with a fanatical following, coming from the far right could veer into territories every bit as unfair, unconstitutional and abusive as a Hitler - only he'd do it his way.

I hope we don't get a chance to find out what life would be like under a Trump presidency.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Links:
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/CIAtimeline.html

http://www3.gettysburg.edu/~tshannon/hist106web/site6/american%20enlightement%20page1.htm

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20160105-the-man-who-studies-the-spread-of-ignorance?

http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/donald-trump-2016-authoritarian-213533

No comments: